General Grabber Vs Bfg Rugged Terrain

Jump to latest follow 1 9 of 9 posts.

General grabber vs bfg rugged terrain.

And with its strong grasp in the mud terrain segment the a t x is general tire s next logical step. Bfg rugged terrain vs rugged trail. I really like the look of the general tire grabber s and the falken wild peak s more than anything else. I only highlight these as the search function google have pointed me that way.

The rugged trail t a is bfgoodrich s on off road all terrain light truck tire designed for pickup jeep and sport utility vehicle drivers who desire aggressive off road looks combined with low rolling resistant lightweight construction along with low noise and year round traction even in light. Their original red letter grabber first featured on the 2010 4runner in the baja 1000 has been replaced by the grabber x3. General grabber at2 or bf goodrich all terrain t a or any other suggestions. It s common for mud to build up during use which makes these less useful for muddy conditions than the falken tires are.

In fact they both make the bfg s look a bit lame. The general grabber is a more aggressive tire and will make more noise than the an at tire. Check out my review of it so far at 1000 miles. Construction style wear and price.

Bfgoodrich all terrain t a ko2 the bf goodrich tires bite into mud confidently and offers dependable gripping force but doesn t eject the mud reliably. We have used every tire out there an sell all the brands through our shop. Both the general at2 and the bfg. The at2 is a way better tire than the bfg i say this will all factors considered.

Looking at general tire s off road portfolio an aggressive all terrain tire was the missing puzzle piece. General makes an at2 that is an all terrain.